Wednesday, July 15th, 2009


Harry Potter officially beats The Dark Knight. According to Variety, Harry Potter’s latest outting, The Half-Blood Prince, conjured a magical night at the box-office beating out the caped crusader as the Best Midnight Movie Gross of all Time. Tickets were hot and according to early estimates, the movie sold a massive $20 million when it opened at 12:01 am Wednesday.

The figure beat out the $18 million set by TDK last year and the record set this year by Transformers 2. Fandango has also reported earlier that the movie has moved up to #2 in its all-time movie ticket sellers list surpassing The Dark Knight and Twilight .

jediyoda

Update: Its official. Warner Bros has confirmed that HBP sold $22.2 million on midnight screenings. This is more than $10 million more compared to the earnings posted by OOTP which was $12 million. Also according to Deadline Hollywood Daily, at this rate the movie is going, the film is set to earn as much $200 million for ist 5-day release.

jediyoda

www.reuters.com

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is set to spread its magic in the box office, when it receives its worldwide release today. However, Harry’s magic is not limited to purely pulling in thousands of enthralled fans. Instead, it is predicted that the film will shatter its previous records, securing the Harry Potter franchise as the most successful film series of all time. The following article by Reuters discusses the economic elements of the world of Potter and compares it to other contemporaries, such as the Dark Knight, which was released to critical and box office acclaim last summer.

By Carl DiOrio

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) – Talk about performance anxiety.

If ever there was a film release almost certain to turn a tidy profit, it would be any Harry Potter movie, and Warner Bros. executives can rest assured that Wednesday’s debut of the franchise’s sixth installment will pile the grosses high through Sunday. But to understand just how fervently studio insiders will be hoping for a muscular box-office bow by “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,” consider that this time last year Warners launched a little film called “The Dark Knight” to rather good effect.

No pressure there.

“The reviews are great,” Warners domestic distribution president Dan Fellman said with a what-me-worry nonchalance. “I think it’s the best Harry Potter picture so far. Certainly, as the cast matures, they keep getting better.”

“Potter” movies have carried PG or PG-13 ratings, with “Prince” toting the less-restrictive former designation. As the cast and their book-based characters age, Warners hopes to attract new, younger patrons while continuing to draw older fans of the series.

“Half-Blood Prince” is set for 4,275 U.S. and Canadian locations Wednesday and 50 more beginning Friday, and its screen count runs north of 8,000. A consensus estimate for its first five days in domestic release has it pulling in $140 million or more, with about $100 million of that sum likely to be rung up during the Friday-Sunday span.

Previous Potter pics have posted cumulative domestic grosses ranging upward from the $249.5 million fetched by 2004′s “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban,” with 2001 franchise launcher “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone” enjoying the series’ best domestic take to date: $317.6 million.

‘PRINCE’ OVER ‘PHOENIX’

The most recent release, 2007′s “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix,” registered $292 million domestically and another $646.2 million internationally. “Phoenix” fetched $44 million on its first day and $139.7 million during its first five days. There is broad consensus that “Prince” can best those numbers.

It already has surpassed the franchise-best tally of $12 million in midnight box office posted by “Phoenix.” By late afternoon Tuesday, exhibition sources made it clear that advance sales of “Prince” tickets for 12:01 a.m. Wednesday performances were outpacing the witching-hour numbers for its immediate predecessor.

In a sign of just how hot tickets sales have been for “Prince,” industryites are whispering that the “Potter” pic has an outside shot at besting the record $18 million midnight box office registered by “The Dark Knight” last July 18. All signs are certainly auspicious, with Fandango and MovieTickets reporting that thousands of performances have already sold out.

“I think they’re beatable,” Fellman said of the “Phoenix” grosses. “Ticket prices have gone up, and the last time we had the first ‘Transformers’ opening just five days before us.”

That picture’s sequel, “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen,” enters its fourth frame this weekend. No other film opens wide domestically this session, and the most prominent second-weekend holdover — Universal’s R-rated comedy “Bruno” — couldn’t have a more distinct target audience from that of “Prince.”

Still, there will be no getting away from those batty comparisons: “Dark Knight” fetched $158 million during its first weekend and $533 million overall domestically. The chances of “Prince” matching that are slim to none.

“Prince” also debuts this week in 85 foreign territories, including Wednesday’s openings in the U.K. and Japan, territories that are key in any Potter bow.

****************************************************************************************************

Domestically, “Prince” will play in just three Imax venues — one each in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago — until more of the specialty screens are freed up in two weeks. But 57 international Imax venues are set to open the picture this week.

(Editing by SheriLinden at Reuters)

~The Nightingale~

Draco Malfoy

Actor Tom Felton recently partook in a Q&A session with AMC news. He discussed the development of sinister character Draco Malfoy in Half-Blood Prince, his interpretation of the character and direction given to him by the one and only J.K.Rowling on how to approach the character.

Over the course of five movies and books, Draco Malfoy hasn’t been much other than a foil to Harry Potter — the rival, the bully, the snob. But in the sixth installment, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, he becomes a chosen one himself, of sorts. Tom Felton — who only looks evil — talks about playing the boy everyone loves to hate.

Q: Draco hasn’t been given that much to do until now, and consequently, neither have you. How did you adjust to the change?

A: I think Jo [Rowling] has quite purposely done that with Draco, made him a typical, slimy bully. But in this film, you get to see a different side of him. For me personally, it was quite daunting, coming to the set with a whole new approach to the character. [Director] David Yates really helped me get in the mindset. In Muggle terms: Draco’s been given a loaded gun, and he has to shoot one prime minister, otherwise, another prime minister is going to shoot him. For a 16-year-old boy, that’s terrifying.

Q: And consequently, we see him unravel. He’s isolated — no more Crabbe and Goyle.

A: That was quite key. He is alone. His friends can’t help him. And they’re not really his friends, they’re just scared of his dad. He’s well and truly by himself. He’s so troubled, and so deep in thought, he’s not paying attention to anything else going on around him. It might sound weird, but before we started shooting, I stared at the wall for about ten minutes, just to get that dazed look down. Just really zone out and not think about anything. There’s a shot of him and this feather, and he looks at it, looks through it…

Q: Like a cat at lint…

A: Yeah! It’s such an eerie moment. It’s completely unnecessary, but it completely defines what Draco’s going through. I kind of feel sorry for him. He’s a true victim of circumstances. And this film is the discovery of that for him. He realizes at the end, but it’s too late.

Q: Since you’ve started filming again, what are your thoughts on how they’re going to split Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows into two movie?

A: We’re not shooting chronologically, and we don’t get the script as two films, we get it as one. We’re shooting some of Film Eight now, and then we’ll go back to Seven, but we don’t call it Eight or Seven, just Seven. It’s just one thing. I think they know where they’re going to split it, but they’re just going to shoot it and see how it feels. Malfoy Manor seems one of the more obvious places to do it. We’re doing the Malfoy Manor scene the Monday we come back, actually. And it’s the first time that we’re going to get me, my mum Narcissa, my dad Lucius, and hopefully Ralph [Fiennes] there as well. And loads of other great, evil characters. I know David Yates is looking forward to furthering this idea of Draco just being a little boy among these horrible men.

Q: What’s your take on that scene?

A: I spoke to Jo [Rowling] literally two days ago about where she wanted to go with it, and she said she wanted to leave it open to interpretation. There’s so many bits that go unanswered, like why does he choose not to recognize Harry to the Death Eaters? And David has this vision: Draco wants to help Harry, and he even wants to befriend him…

Q: But he can’t…

A: And he almost doesn’t recognize that. He knows it, and he doesn’t. He’s a child, not like Harry, who has the foresight of someone more mature. Draco is still a little boy at heart.

Q: Will you play the older Draco for the epilogue scenes?

A: Yeah, Brad Pitt’s busy, so I’ll do it. Sorry, cheap joke. But that will be a great moment. And I think David Yates is a little bit infatuated with Harry and Draco. He loves their relationship. He finds it intriguing.

Q: He’s not the only one. Have you read the fan-fiction that pairs them up as a romance?

A: Oh, no! I heard something really about that a while ago, and I can only assume people have got too much time on their hands. Or not enough stuff to do. One or the other. I should just be grateful Jo didn’t think of that, so I don’t have to shoot those scenes.

But I’m glad we’re not going to rush it, or try to cram the last book into one two-and-a-half-hour film. We get to revel in the filmmaking. There was a time in my life where I took this for granted, but we all know now, this is it. This is our last year together on the set, so everyone wants to give their best and more importantly, enjoy it.

~The Nightingale~

Harry Potter trio

In an interview with USA Today the three central stars of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince discussed life after Harry. Daniel revealed that he would love to return to Broadway, in which he brought the Peter Shaffer play, Equus, last year. Emma Watson discussed her modelling career and plans for the future. Rupert Grint, meanwhile, talked about moving away from everyone’s favourite redhead and his taste in films.

The three young stars of the Harry Potter films talk about their future plans:

Dan USA today

Daniel Radcliffe, movie star

Voldemort’s nemesis earned positive reviews, and a few raised eyebrows, with his turn in Peter Shaffer‘s play Equus. Radcliffe played a disturbed stable boy in London and on Broadway, a role that required full frontal nudity. It showed the squeaky-clean Harry Potter in new light, and the experience was a positive one for Radcliffe.

“Hopefully in the next couple of years, I’ll be back on stage in some form. I’d love to come to Broadway again,” Radcliffe says. “They responded to the fact that I have a work ethic. I was on Broadway at the same time as Jeremy Piven, and I think he made me look really, really good because I didn’t miss a show.” He was jokingly referring to Piven’s run in Speed-the-Plow, which was shortened by the actor’s mercury poisoning.

David Yates, who directed Half-Blood Prince and will direct the upcoming Deathly Hallows movies, has lunch every week with Radcliffe. “Dan is maturing. He’s got this natural leadership skill. I wouldn’t be surprised if he became a director.”

Once the final Potter wraps, Radcliffe is scheduled to play British photojournalist Dan Eldon, who was killed in 1993 in Mogadishu, Somalia. “I really want to do that. It’s just a matter of getting the script absolutely right,” Radcliffe says.

First thing he’ll do after Potter? “Sleep. Ideally, I would have three weeks off and go straight to something else. I get bored not working. … I have a huge amount of energy. When I’m on set, I use it all up. At home, I go wild in my head.”

Emma USA Today

Emma Watson, model bookworm

As the series’ outspoken, super-smart female lead, Watson says she’s often confused with her character, Hermione Granger, off screen. That’s why she has gone to great lengths to separate herself from her iconic teen wizard.

“People see me as Hermione in real life. They forget that I’m acting. We’re quite different people. I want people to understand that I’m versatile,” Watson says. “My way of hoping people would see me differently was through modeling. I worked very hard and did a lot of modeling shoots. Burberry offered me the campaign. That has moved me away a little bit. I’m not good at selling myself.”

She voiced Princess Pea in 2008′s The Tale of Despereaux, but Watson’s focus has remained on the sartorial. She’s the face of Burberry’s fashion campaign and is a regular at Chanel fashion shows. She says that unlike Radcliffe, she didn’t have time to sign up for a lengthy theater run because she was cramming for final exams and applying to colleges. She’s starting school on the East Coast in the fall but won’t say where.

She also isn’t agonizing about a career after Potter. Watson says her focus for the next four years will be firmly on the books. She’d like to work with directors Alfonso Cuaron and Guillermo del Toro but doesn’t feel any pressure. “Acting never was about the money for me. … Maybe in 10 years, I’ll be able to appreciate the fact that I am financially stable and independent and I don’t have to make bad choices. I can be very picky.”

Rupert USA Today

Rupert Grint, clown prince

As Harry’s best friend and upbeat sidekick Ron Weasley, the red-haired Grint has provided most of the film series’ comic relief. And now that his run as Ron is almost over, “I look forward to seeing what else is out there and to move on, really. This is a bubble, really. You don’t get a sense of the real kind of industry. I look forward to it.”

The least gregarious of the three, Grint peppers most of his responses with “really” and is every bit as reticent as Radcliffe is outgoing. Yates says Grint “has never changed. He’s just Rupert, really laid-back and cool. He’s the coolest person I know. He’s so relaxed.”

Grint is the least likely movie star of the trio, and he gravitates toward the offbeat projects he has been able to shoot during his breaks from Potter. There’s his 2006 turn in the small drama Driving Lessons, which detailed the relationship between his shy adolescent and the aging soap star played by Julie Walters (who plays Ron’s mother in the Potter films). In 2009′s Wild Target, Grint becomes the young apprentice of a middle-aged assassin (Bill Nighy).

Has he consciously tried to pursue roles that are the antithesis of chipper, happy-go-lucky Ron?

“It was never that conscious, really. Things just came up. It’s kind of helped, really, to try to move away from this familiar character. I’ve always liked weird films. I’ll wait and see what comes up.”

~The Nightingale~



Moviefone has posted their interviews with the Potter cast on where they asked them questions about the fans. They gamely answered the questions such as their personal lives, if they were their characters and many more.

jediyoda

If sold out shows and tickets are going to be trusted, Harry Potter’s latest outting, The Half-Blood Prince, is going to be bigger than last summer’s The Dark Knight.

More than 4,500 mid-night shows are sold across the US and Canada according to online ticket seller Fandango and Movie tickets. This is more than what is sold for The Dark Knight and will no doubt break the records set previously by the film and this summer’s recent box-office champ Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen.

The movie costs about $400 million to market and produce but that wont be a problem with Potter’s very strong showing at the US and world box office charts.

In related Potter news, C. By this weekend, Harry Potter is going to top Bond as the Most successful movie franchise in history.The boy wizard has earned so far $4.48 billion in the box-office compared to Bonds $5 billion after 22 films, but this weekend’s box-office receipts may change that.

Though there may be more Bond movies in the future, Harry Potter has also two more to go.

jediyoda

Next Page »